Disposed¶9

Liaqat Ali v. Tarique Aziz

Calcutta HC1 Aug 2024CO/988/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 Constitution; Calcutta High Court Civil Revisional Jurisdiction; C.O. 988 of 2024; Biswajit Basu J.; Liaquat Ali v. Tarique Aziz alias Roomi; Title Suit No. 367 of 2019; 2nd Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) Barrackpore; 24-Parganas (North); eviction suit; expeditious disposal of suit; unnecessary adjournments; notice dispensed with; disposed without costs.

What did the court decide?

Notice of the application on the opposite party dispensed with; the learned Trial Judge requested to dispose of Title Suit No. 367 of 2019 expeditiously in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party; petitioner directed to communicate this order to the opposite party; disposed of without any order as to costs. ¶9

Liaqat Ali Vs Tarique Aziz — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2024)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶9

Issue for consideration

Whether a direction should issue to the learned Trial Judge for expeditious disposal of Title Suit No. 367 of 2019, the eviction suit pending before the 2nd Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Barrackpore, in which the petitioner is the plaintiff.

¶7

Court's answer

The learned Trial Judge is requested to make all endeavour to dispose of Title Suit No. 367 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, if the suit is otherwise ready for such disposal, and shall not grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶8

Ratio / Principle

Since the order proposed to be passed in the application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India would cause no prejudice to the opposite party, service of notice of the application upon the opposite party is dispensed with.

¶5

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Calcutta High Court, Civil Revisional Jurisdiction — C.O. 988 of 2024 (01.08.2024, Biswajit Basu, J.): Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by Liaquat Ali, plaintiff in the eviction suit Title Suit No. 367 of 2019 pending before the 2nd Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Barrackpore, 24-Parganas (North), praying for expeditious disposal of the suit. As the proposed order would cause no prejudice to the opposite party (Tarique Aziz alias Roomi), service of notice was dispensed with. The learned Trial Judge was requested to make all endeavour to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, if otherwise ready, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The petitioner was directed to communicate the order to the opposite party. C.O. 988 of 2024 was disposed of without any order as to costs.

Liaqat Ali v. Tarique Aziz

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Liaqat Ali v. Tarique Aziz

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjukta Dam and Anr. Vs Sarmistha Acharjee and Anr.

Pranab Kumar Munshi Vs Amit Kumar Bandyopadhyay and Ors.

Kailash Singh Yadav Vs Asha Yadav and Anr.

Murli Dhar Dhyawala Vs the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. and Ors.

Debasree Roy Vs Debasish Roy

Sushil Kumar Ghorai Vs Anirban Das and Anr.