Disposed¶15

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation v. Tapan Kumar Chowdhury

Calcutta HC2 Sept 2024CO/498/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kolkata Municipal Corporation v. Tapan Kumar Chowdhury; CO 498 of 2020; High Court at Calcutta, Appellate Side, Civil Revisional Jurisdiction; order dated 02.09.2024; annual valuation fixation; Municipal Assessment Tribunal; Hearing Officer-VI; disposal upon opposite party's acceptance of assessment order and payment of all dues; receipt of Assessment Collection Department kept on record; interim order vacated; no merits adjudication; no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Revisional application disposed of; interim order, if any, vacated. ¶15

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation Vs Tapan Kumar Chowdhury — Calcutta HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

38 02.09.2024 Ct. No.22 pg.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

¶3

CO 498 of 2020

¶4

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation Vs.

¶5

Tapan Kumar Chowdhury

¶6

Mr. Alak Kumar Ghosh Mr. Swapan Kumar Debnath Ms. Manisha Nath

¶7

… For the petitioner/KMC

¶8

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner/Kolkata Municipal Corporation is present.

¶9

None appears on behalf of the opposite party.

¶10

This revisional application has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 19^th January, 2016 passed by the learned 2^nd Bench, Municipal Assessment Tribunal, the Kolkata Municipal Corporation, in connection with M.A. Appeal No.2367 of 2013 arising out of an order dated 31^st August, 2013 passed by the Hearing Officer-VI, The Kolkata Municipal Corporation, relating to fixation of annual valuation in respect of the subject premises.

¶11

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that though the judgment and order dated 19^th January, 2016 passed by the Municipal Assessment Tribunal was assailed in this revisional application, but the opposite party has already accepted

¶12

¶13

the order dated 31^st August, 2013 passed by the Hearing Offiver-VI, Kolkata Municipal Corporation regarding fixation of annual valuation in respect of the premises of the opposite party.

¶14

In support of the contention, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/Kolkata Municipal Corporation has filed receipt showing payment of all dues in respect of the subject premises by the opposite party issued by the Assessment Collection Department of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. Let the said receipt be kept with the record.

¶15

With the aforesaid observation, the instant revisional application stands disposed of.

¶16

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

¶17

All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶18

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities.

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation v. Tapan Kumar Chowdhury

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation v. Tapan Kumar Chowdhury

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Saroj Kumar Sarkar Vs Haraprasad Sarkar and Ors.

West Bengal Medical Council and Anr. Vs State Consumer Redressal Commission, and Ors.

Santanu Dam Vs Tarun Das

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs Pravash Kumar Guha

Sumitra Nath & Anr. Vs Ashoke Das & Anr.

Samir Sarkar Vs Nupur Sarkar