High Court at Calcutta dismissed two civil revisional applications on withdrawal based on a settlement between parties; interim orders, if any, vacated.
Revisional applications dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.12.2024 Ct. No. 22 Sl. Nos.2 & 3. KB
In The High Court at Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side
C.O. 3710 of 2019 Sri Vinay Kumar Agarwalla & Anr -versusThe Poddar Mills Ltd. and Ors. with
C.O. 3777 of 2019 The Poddar Mills Ltd. -versusRituraj Distributors Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Mr. Rohit Das, Mr. Anubhav Roy. … For the petitioners in both the matters. Mr. S. Jhunnjhunwala Mr. Varun Kothari
… For the opposite parties. in both the matters.
parties to these revisional applications are present and submitted that the instant revisional applications are required to be dismissed because of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
dismissed as withdrawn.
2
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
Sri Vinay Kumar Agarwalla & Anr
The Poddar Mills Ltd.
The Poddar Mills Ltd.
Rituraj Distributors Pvt. Ltd.
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
