Civil revision challenging refusal to hear two suits with identical issues analogously. Both parties agreed the suits required analogous hearing; the impugned order rejecting the analogous-hearing prayer was set aside, and the trial court was directed to dispose of both suits analogously within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item 04.12. No. 2024 07
Ct 22
rup
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
CO 3532 of 2023
Sri Sakya Singharoy & Anr. Vs
Sri Kamal Patra & Ors.
Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Mr. Samrat Chakraborty. …. For the petitioners. Mr. Sarat Kr. Roy, Mr. Abhishik Banerjee.
… For the opposite party No. 5 to 9.
2
revisional application.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the prayer for analogous hearing of Title Suit No. 6 of 2009 with Title Suit No. 05 of 2009 should be set aside.
Sri Sakya Singharoy & Anr.
Sri Kamal Patra & Ors.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
