Civil revisional application dismissed for default as petitioners were unrepresented and appeared no longer interested in proceeding; any interim order was vacated and no costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.4.2024 24 Ct. no. 652 sb
CO 3303 of 2018
Kartik Chandra Adak & Ors. Vs. Satish Chandra Bhunia & Ors.
Parties are not represented.
I have sufficient reason to believe that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the present application.
Let CO 3303 of 2018 be dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Kartik Chandra Adak & Ors.
Satish Chandra Bhunia & Ors.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
