A civil revisional application was dismissed as infructuous because the impugned order subsequently recalled by the trial judge rendered it futile.
Revision application dismissed as infructuous without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15 sandip Ct. 19 04.09.2024
In The High Court At Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction
C.O. No. 3134 of 2024
Subhasis Ghose
Vs.
Anusuya Ghose (nee Bose)
Mr. Debdipto Banerjee, Mr. Partha Sarathi Maitra, Mr. Rohan Dwaipayan Bhowmick
… For the petitioner.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the revisional application has become infructuous as the order impugned subsequently has been recalled by the learned Trial Judge.
C.O. 3134 of 2024 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Biswajit Basu, J.)
Subhasis Ghose
Anusuya Ghose (nee Bose)
Biswajit Basu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
