The Single Judge dismissed the revisional application (C.O. No.2964 of 2017) for default as the petitioner was not represented and appeared to have lost interest in proceeding. The interim order was vacated.
Dismissed revisional application for default; interim order vacated; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.03.2024. PB Sl. No.21. Ct. No.652.
C.O. No.2964 of 2017
Manjit Kaur Vs Arun Bakshi & Anr.
Parties are not represented and I have reason to believe that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application.
The revisional application, being C.O. 2964 of 2017 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if there be any, stands vacated.
There will be no order as to costs.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Manjit Kaur
Arun Bakshi & Anr.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
