The Court held the revisional application infructuous due to the disposal of the underlying title appeal. Consequently, the interim order directing payment of occupational charges was vacated, and the execution case was directed to continue.
Revisional application disposed off; interim order directing payment of occupational charges vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.O. 286 OF 2023 07.03.2024 Sl no. 10 Kalipada Karmakar Ct no. 19 - Vs - PB/P.M. Anima Adak. Mr. Debasis Sen, Mr. Hare Krishna Haldar, Mr. Anshuman Patra .... for the petitioner. Mr. Purnasish Gupta, Mr. Jayanta Kr. Mukherjee, Mr. Subhendu Sinha Roy ... for the opposite party.
2
3
court will be subject to final disposal of the entire proceeding or adjustments, as the case may be.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revisional application remains maintainable after the disposal of the appealed order.
The course of procedure regarding the deposit of occupational charges after the interim order stands vacated.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kalipada Karmakar
PB/P.M. Anima Adak
Shampa Sarkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
