Disposed
Nilmoni Hazra v. Mallika Baidya and Ors.
Calcutta HCCO/2295/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Ct No.42 Sl. No.7 Mujahid CO 2295 of 2024…
What the court decided
AI extract
Ct No.42 Sl. No.7 Mujahid CO 2295 of 2024…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.11.2025 Ct No.42 Sl. No.7 Mujahid
CO 2295 of 2024
Sri Nilmoni Hazra
Vs.
Mallika Baidya & Ors.
Mr. Sandip Das Mr. S. Bhattacharya Mr. S. Mondal
…for the petitioner
Ms. Sarmistha Ghosh Sharma
…for the opposite party nos.1 to 3
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that opposite party nos.4 and 5 have inadvertently been implicated and he may be allowed to struck off their name from the array of the parties. Learned counsel submits that in fact he had moved an application before learned trial court for including opposite party nos.4 and 5 and that application was dismissed by the learned trial court.
2. In view of the submissions made the name of opposite party nos. 4 and 5 be struck off from the array of the parties.
3. Let the necessary correction be made.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party nos.1, 2 and 3 states that she does not want to file any affidavit-in-opposition.
2
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for extension of interim order. However, on perusal of the record it indicates that interim order was valid till November, 2024 and thereafter no application has been moved for extension of such interim order, as such, no grounds for extension of interim order.
6. Let the matter be listed for final hearing on 1st December, 2025.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)
Sri Nilmoni Hazra
Mallika Baidya
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court