Petitioner was not represented and the court believed they were no longer interested. The application (C.O. 2003 of 2019) was dismissed for default, interim order vacated, and no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 17.05 No.
652 2024 109 akb
C.O. 2003 of 2019
Mrinal Kanti Golder –VersusLafarge India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
None appears on behalf of the parties. On earlier occasion also petitioner was not represented.
I have reason to believe that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application.
The application, being C.O. 2003 of 2019 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if there be any, stands vacated.
There will be no order as to costs.
( Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Mrinal Kanti Golder
Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
