Petitioners filed a civil revisional application challenging a SARFAESI order; the court held that orders under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act are appealable under Section 18, so the revision was not maintainable, and dismissed it without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ML18 September sandip Ct. 19 02.09.2024
In The High Court At Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction
C.O. No. 1480 of 2024
M/s. Maheshwari Multiple Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Vs.
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Mr. Bhaskar Ghosh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee,
Mr. Pratik Majumder … For the petitioners.
The order impugned is an order passed under Section
17 of The Securitisation And Reconstruction of Financial assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 as such, open to appeal under Section 18 thereof.
C.O. 1480 of 2024 is therefore dismissed as not maintainable without any order as to costs.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Biswajit Basu, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision lies against an order passed under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, which is appealable under Section 18.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Maheshwari Multiple Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Bank of Baroda
Anr.
Biswajit Basu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
