Allowed

Commissioner of Central Excise , Kolkata -Vii v. M/S. Prasanti Wax Oils Private Limited

Calcutta HC9 Jul 2024CEXA/18/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revenue appeal against Tribunal order allowing the assessee's excise appeal by following Indsur Global, whose operation was stayed by the Supreme Court in SLP No.16523/2015. Following KIC Metaliks, this Court set aside the Tribunal order and restored the appeal to the Tribunal, to be decided after the Supreme Court judgment; substantial questions of law were left open.

What the court decided

AI extract

Commissioner of Central Excise , Kolkata -Vii Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2024)

¶1

OD-17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION [CENTRAL EXCISE] ORIGINAL SIDE

¶3

CEXA/18/2024 IA NO: GA/2/2024 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE , KOLKATA -VII VS M/S. PRASANTI WAX OILS PRIVATE LIMITED

¶4

BEFORE :

¶5

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA DATE : 9^th July, 2024.

¶6

Appearance : Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. …for appellant

¶7

The Court :- This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 25.04.2023 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata in Excise Appeal No. 431 of 2011. The revenue has suggested the following substantial questions of law for consideration :-

¶8

i. Whether the Learned Tribunal is right and justified in allowing the appeal of the assessee/respondent solely relying upon the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Insur Global Limited vs. Union of India reported in 2014(310)ELT 833 (Guj.) and the decision of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd. –vs- UOI when the issue of

¶9

¶10

Constitutional Validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court ?

¶11

ii. Whether without to comply with the provisions of Rule 8(1) read with Rule 8(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 can the respondent is permitted to clear their goods in subsequent period ? iii. Whether the stay granted in the case of Indsur Global Ltd. by the Hon’ble Supreme Court is binding upon the Learned Tribunal or not ?

¶12

We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.

¶13

The two notices sent to the respondent are returned.

¶14

This appeal filed by the department under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 is directed against the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Zonal Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) dated 25.04.2023. By the said order, the appeal filed by the respondent/assessee was allowed by following the decision of the High Court of Gujarat in the case of Indsur Global Ltd. Vs. Union of India [2014 (310) E.L.T. 833 (Guj.)] . The learned Tribunal has also taken note of the decision of this Court in Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. [2017 (8) TMI 1515 - Calcutta High Court]. It cannot be disputed that the decision in the case of Indsur Global (supra) was challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal No.16523/2015 and by order dated 24^th September, 2015 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has stayed the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat. The decision of

¶15

¶16

this Court in Goyal MG Gases (supra) appears to have been rendered taking note of the decision of the High Court of Gujarat in the case of Indsur Global (supra). When similar appeal came up before this Court on earlier occasion, the Court has set aside the order of the learned Tribunal and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal to be kept pending before the Tribunal to be taken up for decision after the judgment is rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. We refer to the order in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur Vs. M/s. KIC Metaliks Ltd., in CEXA/20/2023 dated 24^th May, 2024.

¶17

In the light of the above, the appeal filed by the department is allowed. The order passed by the learned Tribunal is set aside and the appeal is restored to the file of the learned Tribunal and the matter shall be kept pending and taken up after the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal No.16523/2015 and other connected matters.

¶18

The substantial questions of law which have been raised are left open. The connected application [GA/2/2024] stands closed .

¶19

(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE

¶20

(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

¶21

pkd/GH

Commissioner of Central Excise , Kolkata -Vii v. M/S. Prasanti Wax Oils Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Commissioner of Central Excise , Kolkata -Vii v. M/S. Prasanti Wax Oils Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Puja Maria Naslund Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Shri Suresh Ch. Shaw and Ors. Vs Life Insurance Corporation of India and Ors.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kalyani and Ors. Vs Samapti Das

Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Haldia Vs M/S Sarvopari Impex Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Customs Port Kolkata Vs M/S P D Associates

Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata Vs M/S. G. S. Atwal and Co. Engineering Pvt. Ltd.