Dismissed
Radhaballab Debnath & Anr. v. the Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Calcutta HCWPO/549/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
9 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA…
What the court decided
AI extract
9 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD – 9
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
WPO/549/2018
RADHABALLAB DEBNATH & ANR. -Versus-
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Date : 5th September, 2023
Appearance :
Mr.Parikshit Basu, Adv. Ms. Bidisha Manna, Adv. ..for the respondent nos.7.
Mr. Alak Kumar Ghosh, Adv. Mr.Gopal Chandra Das, Adv. ...for the KMC.
Mr.Arindam Banerjee, Adv. Mr.Ratul Bhattacharjee, Adv. ..for the respondent no.8.
The Court : Respondent-KMC as well as private respondent
is appearing but no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioner. This is a writ petition pertaining to the year 2018 and is a fairly old one.
Considering the same and in the absence of the
petitioner, I find it proper to dismiss the writ petition for default.
(RAI CHATTOPADHYAY, J.)
S.Das/
Radhaballab Debnath & Anr.
Kolkata Municipal Corporation
Respondent No. 7
Respondent No. 8
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court