Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. and Anr. v. the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Calcutta
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional…
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-5
ORDER SHEET
WPO/52/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
ADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LIMITED AND ANR. VERSUS THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, CALCUTTA
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA Date : 20th March, 2023.
Appearance: Mr. Soumava Mukherjee, Adv.
The Court: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits
that the writ petition has become infructuous since the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate has already passed an order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
WPO/52/2023 is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.)
sg.
2
ADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LIMITED AND ANR.
THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, CALCUTTA
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court