Disposed

M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Anr. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors.

Calcutta HC13 Mar 2023WPO/268/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge Bench directed the petitioners to deposit 25% pre-deposit of assessed dues under Section 45A to enable the appeal under Section 45AA of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 to be disposed of on merits. It stayed the Section 45G garnishee order; vacancy requires automatic vacation of stay.

What did the court decide?

Directing the petitioners to deposit 25% pre-deposit within four weeks; appellate authority to hear and dispose of the appeal on merits thereafter; stay on the notice/garnishee order dated 6th Septemb

M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Anr… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

OD-1

¶2

WPO/268/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE

¶3

M/S. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED AND ANR. VERSUS EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS.

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

The Hon’ble Justice RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: 13^TH MARCH, 2023

¶6

APPEARANCE Mr. Santanu Chatterjee, Advocate ….for the petitioners Mr. Shiv Chandra Prasad, Advocate …for the ESIC

¶7

The court: The present writ application has been filed, inter alia, challenging an order dated 6^th September, 2022 passed under Section 45G of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act).

¶8

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that despite the petitioners preferring an appeal under Section 45AA of the said Act, the ESI authorities have not disposed of the same. On the contrary, the respondents are attempting to enforce a garnishee order dated 6^th September, 2022 issued under Section 45G of the said Act.

¶9

Mr. Chatterjee, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that till date, the petitioners have not received any communication with regard to the fate of the aforesaid appeal.

¶10

¶11

Mr. Prasad, learned Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that since the petitioners had not made the pre-deposit, as required under Section 45AA of the said Act, in respect of determination made under Section 45A of the said Act, the petitioners’ appeal has not been disposed of. By drawing attention of this Court to pages 73 and 80 of the writ application, he says approximately a sum of Rs.39 lakh and odd has been determined towards the contributions payable by the petitioners under Section 45A of the said Act.

¶12

Having heard learned Advocates for the respective parties and after perusal of the records, I am of the view that the present writ petition can be disposed of by directing the petitioners to comply with the provisions as regards the pre-deposit, as is required to be made while filing an appeal under Section 45AA of the said Act. If the pre-deposit of 25% of the amount of Rs.39 lakh, in respect of order passed under Section 45A of the said Act, is made by the petitioners within a period of four weeks from date, the appellate authority shall hear out and dispose of the petitioners’ appeal, under Section 45AA of the said Act, on merits after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. Till disposal of the aforesaid appeal, the notice/garnishee order dated 6^th September, 2022, issued under Section 45G of the said Act shall remain stayed. In the event the petitioners do not deposit the pre-deposit amount as directed hereinabove, the order of stay shall stand automatically vacated and respondents shall be at liberty to proceed against the petitioners in accordance with law.

¶13

¶14

With the aforesaid observations, the writ application being WPO 268

¶15

of 2023 stands disposed of.

¶16

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶17

Urgent certified copy of this order and judgment, if applied for, be given to the appearing parties as expeditiously as possible upon compliance with all necessary formalities.

¶18

(RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.)

¶19

akg/

M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Anr. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Anr. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradip Kumar Bhar Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

P . Ram Babu Vs Union of India & Ors.

Saibesh Dey Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rafiqul Islam Vs Union of India & Ors.

Messrs Tata Chemicals Limite Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Deonath Prasad Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.