The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition for default as the petitioner failed to appear and showed no interest in proceeding, deeming service of notice unnecessary.
The writ petition was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-24 WPO No.2485 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
P. P. SUPPLIERS AND AGENCIES PVT. LTD. VERSUS
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATON & ORS.
BEFORE :
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAI CHATTOPADHYAY Date : 24th August, 2023.
Appearance : Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Gopal Chandra Das, Adv. ..for KMC.
Ms. Manisha Nath, Adv.
The Court:-Mr. Mukherjee, learned Advocate appears for the respondent-KMC.
No one represents the petitioner.
Record reveals that on several previous dates the petitioner was not represented before this Court.
It appears that the petitioner is no more interested to proceed with the matter. There is no necessity apparent to serve any notice upon the petitioner through the department.
Let the writ petition be dismissed for default.
(RAI CHATTOPADHYAY, J.)
pkd
P. P. SUPPLIERS AND AGENCIES PVT. LTD.
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
