Allowed

Abdul Kader Mondal v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC14 Jun 2023WPLRT/175/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A coordinate bench of the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal set aside an order rejecting an application for converting land records from 'bastu' to 'pond'. The court directed the District Land and Land Reforms Officer to inspect the plot, videographically record the existence of a water body, and process the application under Section 4C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated August 8, 2022 is set aside. The concerned District Land and Land Reforms Officer is directed to hold an inspection and pass a reasoned order on the original application withi

Abdul Kader Mondal Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Landlord and Tenant | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

14.06.2023 KAUSHIK

¶3

WPLRT 175 of 2022

¶4

Abdul Kader Mondal

¶5

Vs.

¶6

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶7

Mr. Ejaz Hossain … for the petitioner

¶8

Mr. Chandi Charan De Mr. Supratim Dhar Mr. Anirban Sarkar

¶9

… for the State

¶10

The challenge in the writ petition is directed towards an order dated August 8, 2022 passed by the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal in O.A. No. 133 of 2019.

¶11

By the impugned order, the learned Tribunal rejected the original application on the ground of explicit bar under Section 44(2a) of the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act in converting the record of rights from ‘bastu’ to ‘pond’.

¶12

The contention of the writ petitioner is that, a large portion of the plot concerned is a water body and should be recorded as such in the record of rights. The application was under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.

¶13

In view of such contention and the impugned order of the learned Tribunal, the Coordinate Bench required the

¶14

¶15

learned advocate for the State to take instructions. On June

¶16

7, 2023, learned advocate appearing for the State submitted a report dated May 26, 2023, which was taken on record. On perusing the report, we deemed it appropriate that the concerned Block Land and Land Reforms Officer (BL&LRO) should hold physical inspection of the plot and make a video photography with regard thereto.

¶17

Report as called for by the order dated June 7, 2023 along with pen drive containing the video photography of the inspection filed in Court be taken on record.

¶18

We perused the report dated June 12, 2023 as also the video recording of the inspection.

¶19

The report dated June 16, 2023 speaks of an water body in a portion of the land concerned. The video photography also suggest that there subsisted a water body on the plot concerned.

¶20

Conversion of user of land is permissible under the provisions of Section 4C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.

¶21

In such circumstances, the concerned District Land and Land Reforms Officer (DL&LRO) will consider the original application being O.A. No. 133 of 2019 along with its

¶22

¶23

annexures as an application under Section 4C of the Act of 1955. He will afford an opportunity of hearing to the writ petitioner. He will afford reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the co-sharers of the plot concerned. He is at liberty to consider such documents and hear such parties that he deems appropriate. He will pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the writ petitioner and all the co-sharers of the plot concerned. It is expected that the concerned DL&LRO completes the entire exercise within the period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.

¶24

The impugned order dated August 8, 2022 is set

¶25

aside.

¶26

WPLRT 175 of 2022 is disposed of accordingly without any order as to costs.

¶27

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶28

(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Abdul Kader Mondal v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Kader Mondal v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kesharwani Brothers & Another Vs Dy. Director, Enforcement Directorrat

Sangeeta Saha Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

State of West Bengal and Ors. Vs Sayantika Das

State of West Bengal and Ors. Vs Sarbojit Mukherjee

Subhasish Dasgupta Vs State of West Bengal

Avishek Banik Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.