This single-paragraph judgment dismissed a petition seeking expeditious disposal of an application. The petitioner requested a direction based on a tribunal order for fresh service. The court refused relief, finding no material on record that the impugned order dated November 29, 2022 had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24
06.06.2023
WPLRT 12 of 2023
KAUSHIK
Bisweswar Parua
Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Manna … for the petitioner
Mr. T. M. Siddiqui Mr. S. Dhar Ms. A. Pandey … for the State
Petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the
original application.
By the impugned order, the learned Tribunal directed fresh service to be effected upon the respondents and to file affidavit of service to such effect.
There is no material on record to suggest that the
order dated November 29, 2022 was complied with.
In such circumstances, we are unable to grant the
relief of a direction, as prayed for.
WPLRT 12 of 2023 is disposed of accordingly
without any order as to costs.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the tribunal's order directing fresh service should be followed given non-compliance.
Kaushik Bisweswar Parua
The State of West Bengal
Debangsu Basak
Md. Shabbar Rashidi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
