The single judge disposed of a contempt application by ordering that the proceedings be discharged and interim orders vacated upon compliance with the earlier order.
Contempt application disposed; rule discharged; interim orders vacated; no order as to costs; personal presence dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09.06.2023 Court No.13 Item No.15 AP
WPCRC 94 of 2023 In WPA 6696 of 2016
Sk. Md. Nuruzzaman Vs.
Dr. Rashmi Kamal and Anr.
Mr. Sk. Rejaul Alam
… For the Petitioner.
Mr. Arjun Roy Mukherjee
… For the Alleged Contemnors.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Sk. Md. Nuruzzaman
Dr. Rashmi Kamal and Anr.
Rajasekhar Mantha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
