Order fixing the return date of WPA 9933 of 2011 after notice was issued to the Ministry of Law and Justice to engage counsel; no dispositive order passed on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.04.2025 DL-33 Ct. No. 33 Srimanta
In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
WPA 9933 of 2011
Ramaprasad Tah
- Vs.-
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Achin Kumar Majumder, Ms. Ananya Adhikary
…for the petitioner.
The learned Advocate representing the petitioner is present.
None appeared to represent the respondents who refused to accept the copy of the supplementary affidavit from the learned Advocate representing the petitioner as submitted.
The learned Registrar Administration (L & OM) is directed to serve notice upon the office of Ministry of law and justice, Department of Legal Affairs, Branch Secretariat, Kolkata, at 11, strand Road, Kolkata 700001 to engage an advocate to represent the respondents/Union of India and file a compliance report to that effect on the returnable date.
2
Let the matter be fixed on 18th July,
Copy of the order be sent to the office of the learned Registrar Administration ( L & OM) for due compliance.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Ramaprasad Tah
Union of India
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
