Dismissed
Abdur Rahim v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Calcutta HCWPA/6960/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Sl. No. 19 Ct. No. 42 WPA/6960/2013 Abdur…
What the court decided
AI extract
Sl. No. 19 Ct. No. 42 WPA/6960/2013 Abdur…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27.06.2023 Srimanta Sl. No. 19 Ct. No. 42
WPA/6960/2013
Abdur Rahim -Vs.-
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Debasish Kundu
…for the petitioner.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the instant writ petition was filed with a prayer that the lease period may be extended for six months. Now, it is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that the said period is already over and the instant writ petition becomes infructuous by efflux of time.
In view of such submission made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of being infructuous.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Abdur Rahim
State of West Bengal
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court