Writ petition dismissed for default as the accused-applicant-filing the impugned order did not take any step after admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.07.2023 Sl. No. 18 Suman Ct.No.42.
WPA 6381 of 2012
Sukha Ranjan Nandi Vs. KMDA and Ors.
Mr. Satyajit Talukdar Ms. Piu Karmakar
..for the KMDA
The petitioner takes no steps.
The respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are represented by the Mr. Talukdar, learned advocate. It appears from the record that on 2nd May, 2012 the instant writ petition was admitted. But subsequently, the petitioner did not take any step.
Considering such aspect of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed for default.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Sukha Ranjan Nandi
KMDA
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
