Writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner, who was granted liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
Liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.06.2023 Sl. No.3. Mithun Ct.No.42. WPA 5211 of 2023
With
IA No: CAN/1/2023 [Application not found]
M/s. Roy Enterprise
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Ram Anand Agarwala, Adv. Ms. Nibedita Pal, Adv. Mr. Ananda Gopal Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Sonam Ray, Adv.
…for the petitioner.
Mr. Timir Baran Saha, Adv.
…for the applicant in CAN 1 of 2023.
It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner under instruction that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the instant writ petition on certain technical grounds and subsequent development.
It is also submitted by him that opportunity may be given to the petitioner to withdraw the instant writ petition with leave to file the writ petition afresh on the self-same cause of action after adding necessary parties as private respondents.
The written instruction be kept on record.
The instant writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
The petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the self-same cause of action.
2
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
M/s. Roy Enterprise
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
