Allowed

Bidyut Sarkar v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC4 May 2023WPA/456/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Calcutta High Court held that a retired teacher entitled interest on delayed revised gratuity and arrear pension. The court directed payment of 6% simple interest from the date of revision, with a default penalty of 10% if payment was not made within three months of the server copy.

What did the court decide?

Director of Pension and Treasury Officer directed to pay 6% simple interest on revised gratuity and arrear pension from date of revision; default interest of 10% if not paid within three months.

Bidyut Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

45 04.05.2023 pp.

¶2

Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Jurisdiction

¶3

WPA 456 of 2023

¶4

Bidyut Sarkar versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶5

Mr. Debajit Kundu …For the Petitioner.

¶6

Mr. Hirak Barman, Mr. Pretom Das

¶7

…For the State.

¶8

The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a High School and retired from service on 31^st March, 2018. The first Pension Payment Order was issued on 6^th July, 2018. Under the Revision of Pay and Allowance Rules, 2019 (in short, “ROPA Rules, 2019”), there was further revision of the pension and gratuity amount payable to the petitioner. The revised Pension Payment Order was issued on 4^th November, 2020 and the revised gratuity and revised arrear pension was disbursed on 4^th December, 2020. The petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of revised gratuity and also revised arrear pension.

¶9

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the materials on record as also the orders passed by this Court in similar facts.

¶10

An employee immediately on his/her retirement becomes entitled to his/her retiral benefits. In order to provide the retired employee with all benefits in time, the processing of his/her pension papers starts six months before the date of his/her retirement.

¶11

¶12

It is also a settled position of law that the right of a retired employee to get his/her retiral dues on the date of attaining superannuation is a valuable right which accrues in his/her favour on the date of his/her attaining superannuation. Further, gratuity and pension are no more considered to be a bounty to be handed out by the State at its whim. An employee has a statutory right to receive gratuity and pension upon retirement. If payment of such gratuity and pension is delayed the retired employee is surely entitled to get interest for such delayed payment in view of the provisions of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and treating arrears of pension on similar line. The interest is also payable as the retired employee is deprived from the benefit of the money during the period of delay.

¶13

In the present case, it was the bounden duty of the State to disburse the gratuity and pension amount on the due date. If it has failed to do so and has released such amount after unexplained delay, it is obliged to pay interest to the retired employee. Pension and gratuity are welfare provisions aimed at maintaining the life of a retired employee and his/her dependents. This is compensatory in nature.

¶14

It has also been held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in S.K. Dua v. State of Haryana & Anr. reported in (2008) 3 SCC 44 that an employee has a right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India to claim interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits.

¶15

In view of the aforesaid and keeping in mind the financial condition of the employer after the pandemic and as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the judgment reported in (2021) 11 SCC 543 ( State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. v. Dinavahi Lakshmi

¶16

¶17

Kameswari ), I direct the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the writ petitioner at the rate of 6% simple interest per annum on the amount of revised gratuity and revised arrear pension paid belatedly, calculated on and from the date of revision till the date of actual payment.

¶18

The concerned officers/department shall start the process of disbursing the interest immediately on receiving a server copy of this order without waiting for the certified copy. At the time of payment of the interest amount, the petitioner shall produce the certified copy of the order. The payment has to be made within three months from the date of receipt of the server copy from the petitioner and/or his/her advocate. In default of making payment of the amount within three months, the respondent authorities shall be bound to pay interest @ 10 per cent simple interest per annum on the money paid belatedly from the date of revision till the date of actual payment.

¶19

Since no affidavit in opposition has been invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to be admitted.

¶20

WPA 456 of 2023 is disposed of.

¶21

There will be no order as to costs.

¶22

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties as early as possible.

¶23

(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)

Bidyut Sarkar v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bidyut Sarkar v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Goodricke Group Limited Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Nasruma Anam Baby Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Radha Debnath @ Radha Chakraborty Vs the Sub-Inspector of Schools and Ors.

Prasadi Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Aditi Biswas Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Madhab Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.