Disposed

Jine Karmakar v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC6 Jun 2023WPA/4159/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposes of a writ petition where the petition contests non-compliance of a Domestic Violence Act order. The petitioner directed to resume residence in a specified property, maintenance of Rs. 3,000 ordered, and police report took on record.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to return to specified property; private respondent directed to continue maintenance payment of Rs. 3,000.

Jine Karmakar Vs State of West Bengal and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

06.06.2023. Court No.13 Item No. 17 ap

¶2

W.P.A. No. 4159 of 2023

¶3

Jine Karmakar Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Partha Sarathi Das, Ms. Shanta Sarkar, Mr. Debojyoti De.

¶5

…For the petitioner.

¶6

Mr. Asish Kumar Guha, Mr. Naren Ghosh Dastidar. Mr. T.B. Laha, Mr. Prabir Majumder, Mr. S. Majumder, Mr. Debraj Shil.

¶7

…For the State.

¶8

…For the respondent No.4.

¶9

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be taken on record.

¶10

The petitioner complains that an order dated 4^th January, 2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 3^rd Court at Ranaghat, Nadia under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 of a right of residence and payment of maintenance, is not being complied with by the private respondent.

¶11

The petitioner complains of alleged inaction on the part of Dhantala Police Station in this regard.

¶12

The private respondent is represented.

¶13

It is submitted that the husband and family are contesting the said proceedings. However, they have no objection as of now for the petitioner to reside in the house on the land recorded in J.L. No. 112,

¶14

¶15

Khatian No. 2811, Mouza – 112 of 552 measuring about 0.1071 decimals.

¶16

The petitioner may, therefore, return to the said property and reside thereat. The private respondent shall continue to comply with the order of maintenance of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand only) payable to the petitioner as directed by the Court below.

¶17

The aforesaid order is passed is subject to the final result of the proceedings in Misc. Case No. 405 of 2022 (Jini Karmakar – Vs. – Shyam Karmakar).

¶18

The petitioner shall not enter into or disturb the private respondent in any other property.

¶19

Dhantala Police Station has submitted a report dated 12^th March, 2023 in the form of instructions addressed to the Government Pleader, High Court, Calcutta, which is taken on record.

¶20

With the aforesaid directions, the instant writ petition shall stand disposed of.

¶21

There will be no order as to costs. 12. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶22

( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )

Jine Karmakar v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jine Karmakar v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mumtaz Khan Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Esmatara Bibi Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Anubrata Mondal Vs Union of India and Ors.

Selim Sk. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Halim Khan Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Asraf Hossain Vs the Inspector-in Charge, Haringhata Police Station and Ors.