The High Court dismissed this writ petition for default as the petitioners were absent and showed no interest in proceeding; any interim order was vacated and connected applications were also dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed for default; interim order vacated; connected application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
05.09.2023 17
ss
W.P.A. 22226 of 2016
CAN 2 of 2020
VHP Construction Pvt. Ltd. & anr. Vs.
State Bank of India & ors.
Mr. Rohit Das Ms. Kishwar Rahman
… for the respondents
None appears on behalf of the petitioners when the
matter is called on. No accommodation is prayed for.
Counsel for the respondents is present.
It appears that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
As a consequence thereof, the connected
application, if any, stands dismissed.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
VHP Construction Pvt. Ltd.
State Bank of India
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
