Petitioner abandoned the Writ Petition and the Court dismissed it on the ground of non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed on ground of non-prosecution. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01 01.02.2023 rkd Ct.15
W.P.A. 21004 of 2012
Mr. Abhimanyu Das
-vs-
The Joint Municipal Commissioner, Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Mr. Ram Krishna Chandra
….for the petitioner.
At the time of call Mr. Chandra, learned advocate representing the petitioner submits on instruction that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter. In support of such submission one letter dated 20th December, 2022 addressed to the learned advocate for the petitioner has been placed before this Court which is taken on record.
In view of aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned Advocates for the parties on the usual
undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Abhimanyu Das
The Joint Municipal Commissioner & Ors.
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
