Coram of Jay Sengupta, J. Petitioners filed another writ petition challenging the same inaction and withdrew this application on the prayer of their counsel.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3
13.09.2023 ssi
Ct 14
WPA 16639 of 2023
Ramkrishna Mandal & ors. -vsState of West Bengal & ors. Ms. Pampa Dey (Dhabal) ….for the petitioners Mr. Rajarshi Basu Mr. K. M. Hossain ...for the State
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that in view of certain subsequent events, the petitioners have filed another writ petition challenging the entire impugned inaction. Therefore, the petitioners would not like to press this application.
On the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Ramkrishna Mandal & ors.
State of West Bengal & ors.
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
