Disposed

Bibekananda Biswas and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC8 Dec 2023WPA/13652/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition alleging unauthorized land utilization. The Court granted liberty to implead a new respondent and directed them to consider a comprehensive representation submitted by the petitioners within a specified timeframe.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to implead Executive Officer; liberty to submit representation; direction to respondent to consider representation within six weeks; result communication within one week.

Bibekananda Biswas and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and… — Property and Title | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

08.12.2023 rc/ct.no.10 Item No.09

¶2

WPA No. 13652 of 2023 Bibekananda Biswas & Ors. Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶3

Mr. Sandip De Mr. Abhijit Sarkar …for the petitioners Mr. Chandi Charan De Mr. Soumitra Bandyopadhyay Mr. Priyabrata Batabyal Mr. Anirban Sarkar …for the State Mr. Asim Hati Ms. Nandini Sharma Ms. Barnali Deb …for the respondent no.6

¶4

Affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record. On the prayer of the petitioners liberty is granted to implead the Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, North 24Parganas as respondent no. 9 in the writ petition.

¶5

The cause title of the writ petition be amended accordingly.

¶6

The petitioners complain that their land has been utilised by the Zilla Parishad without acquiring the same by due process of law. No compensation has also been paid to the petitioners.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners takes this Court to Annexure P-6 to the writ petition which is a reply to an application made by the petitioners under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The said reply dated August 26, 2022 says that the plot in question is not found involved in

¶8

¶9

LA Case, meaning thereby that the plot was not acquired by the State.

¶10

The petitioners seek liberty to submit a comprehensive representation before the respondent no. 9 and pray for a direction upon respondent no.9 to consider the said representation at the earliest.

¶11

It is submitted on behalf of the respondent that the respondent no. 9 be directed to consider the representation in accordance with law.

¶12

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit a comprehensive representation before the 9^th respondent ventilating their grievance within two weeks from date. The 9^th respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation within six weeks from the date of receipt thereof after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to all concerned including the petitioners, in accordance with law.

¶13

The decision taken by the authority shall be communicated to the petitioner within a week thereof.

¶14

With the above observations and directions this writ petition is disposed of.

¶15

There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to be admitted.

¶16

¶17

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance of necessary formalities.

¶18

(Suvra Ghosh,J)

Bibekananda Biswas and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bibekananda Biswas and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Singha and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Rushiya Bibi and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Mojidur Rahaman and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Bhairab Chandra Das Vs Ardhendu Sekhar Pandit

Rowson Jamal Khan Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Md. Aslam Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.