The Court directed the department not to list the writ petition, noting that it is already disposed of. This effectively confirms prior dismissal or resolution.
Direction not to list the writ petition as it is already disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7 08.08.2023 D.Hira Court No. 12
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
WPA 10687 of 2020
Board of Trustees for Syama Prasad Mookerjee Post & Anr.
Versus
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Jena. … for the petitioners
Dr. Madhusudan Saha Roy, Mr. Malay Dhar, Mr. Pranab Kumar Ghosh. … for the respondent nos. 2 to 16
The department is directed not to list the
writ petition, which is already disposed of.
(V.M. Velumani, J.)
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Board of Trustees for Syama Prasad Mookerjee Post
Union of India
V.M. Velumani
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
