Dismissed

Maibub Mallick @ Mehebub Mallik v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC27 Jun 2023WPA/10269/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of a writ petition where police investigation reports did not substantiate allegations against the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to participate in the enquiry and ruled that the ED could independently investigate monetary allegations.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; no order as to costs; parties to act on server copy of the order.

Maibub Mallick @ Mehebub Mallik Vs State of West… — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

27.06.2023. Court No.13 Item No. 4 ap

¶2

W.P.A. No. 10269 of 2023

¶3

Maibub Mallick @ Mehebub Mallik Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Mr. Soumya Nag

¶5

…For the petitioner.

¶6

Mr. T.M. Siddiqui, Ms. Amrita Panja Moulick. Mr. Piush Chaturvedi, Sk. Rejaul Alam.

¶7

… For State.

¶8

…For the respondent no.12. Mr. Ashok Kumar Chakraborty, ld. ASG, Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, ld. DSGI, Mr. Sukanta Chakraborty.

¶9

…For the CBI. Mr. Phiroze Edulji, Ms. Anamika Pandey.

¶10

…For the ED.

¶11

The Director General and Inspector General of Police, West Bengal has filed a detailed report. He had appointed a Deputy Inspector General of Police, Medinipur Range, Kharagpur to cause an enquiry. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Medinipur Range, Kharagpur has submitted a report dated 18^th June, 2023 to the Director General and Inspector General of Police, West Bengal.

¶12

The petitioner shall notify to come and appear before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Medinipur Range, Kharagpur and participate in the enquiry. He did not do so. A copy of the notice addressed to the petitioner is kept with the record.

¶13

¶14

The report of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Medinipur Range, Kharagpur indicates that the allegations against the Panskura Police Station and the Civic Volunteer could not be substantiated.

¶15

The report of the Director General and Inspector General of Police, West Bengal is kept with the record.

¶16

Since the petitioner says that huge amount of money is lying in the account of the concerned Police Officer, the Enforcement Directorate may, in their own discretion, cause enquiries and take steps as they may be entitled in law.

¶17

Let a copy of the report of the Director General and Inspector General of Police, West Bengal be handed over to the Counsel for the petitioner.

¶18

With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition shall stand disposed of.

¶19

There will be no order as to costs.

¶20

All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶21

( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )

Maibub Mallick @ Mehebub Mallik v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maibub Mallick @ Mehebub Mallik v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shiva Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sukla Panja Rajak Vs Ramanul Ganguly

Balbindar Kaur Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Birendra Mishra and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sri Kshitish Chandra De Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Rajib Bhunia and Others Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.