The issue no.1, in the facts and circumstances as aforesaid, is decided in favour of the plaintiff. The issue nos.2 and 3 are taken up together. The Will dated 6th February, 2013 is a registered Will and unless a strong case is made out doubting the genuineness of such Will, the Will has to be accepted to be genuine. The defendant has not led any evidence to question the genuineness of the Will though he had questioned the same in his affidavit in support of caveat which has been subsequently treated as the written statement. That the testator himself had gone to the registration office to get the Will executed and registered as deposed by the attesting witness in the absence of any contrary view proves the testamentary capacity of the testator as on the date of making of the Will. The subject Will is, therefore, also a valid document. In the absence of any evidence being led by the defendant with regard to issue nos.4 and 5, the allegation made by the defendant that the testator was suffering from ill-health and mental incapacity is not substantiated. It cannot also be held without any evidence being led that the Will in question is a product of fraud or had been executed under undue influence. No suspicious circumstances are found encircling the Will in
