M/S Joy Tara Brass Moulders v. Road v Pranati Mondal & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
2023 Ct. No. 04 Ab SAT 101 of 2020 M/s. Joy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02 31.08. 2023
Ct. No. 04
Ab
SAT 101 of 2020
M/s. Joy Tara Brass Moulders Vs.
Smt. Pranati Mondal and another.
Mr. Haradhan Banerjee, Mr. Anirban Ghosh. … for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjib Seth.
… for the respondents.
It appears that an undertaking is filed before the Executing Court instead of filing before this Court.
Mr. Haradhan Banerjee, learned Advocate for the appellant, submits that there was a miscommunication amongst the learned Advocate-on-Record of the instant appeal and the learned Advocate-on-Record appearing before the Executing Court and prays for an extension of time to file affidavit of undertaking in terms of the order dated 24th August 2023.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Joy Tara Brass Moulders
- respondent
Smt. Pranati Mondal
Coram
Harish Tandon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAT/101/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court