Safura Bibi v. Alim Sk.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed due to non-prosecution as the matter was settled between parties out of court. Interim order remains vacated.
What did the court decide?
Appeal SA 295 of 2005 and connected applications, if any, dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
S/L 1
20.02.2023 Court No.652 SD
SA 295 of 2005
Safura Bibi Vs. Alim Sk. & Ors.
Mr. Amitava Mukherjee Ms. Mun Mun Dubey
… for the Appellant.
Affidavit of service filed by the appellant in Court today be kept with the record.
Respondents are not represented.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to proceed further with the appeal as the matter has been settled between the parties out of court.
Accordingly, SA 295 of 2005 along with connected applications, if any, is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Department is directed to send the lower courts record, if arrived, along with a copy of this order to the court below at once.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Safura Bibi
- respondent
Alim Sk.
Coram
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/295/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court