Prakash Chand Vaidya & Ors. v. Shaheen Khan
Case brief
What is this about?
ct. 236 sk,sl. 8 S.A.135 of 2019 Prakash…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.10.2023 ct. 236
sk,sl. 8
S.A.135 of 2019
Prakash Chand Vaidya & Ors.-vs-Shakil Ahmed .
Mr. Bhaskar Ghosh, Ld. Sr. Adv. Mr. Rwitendra Banerjee Mr. Siddhartha Paul Mr. Janardhan Mondal
…for the appellants.
Mr. Dipta Dipak Banerjee Mr. Joydeep Chatterjee Mr. Diwakar Pathak Ms. Nilakshmi Ghosh
……..for the respondent.
- Shakil Ahmed was the original appellant before the court at whose instance second appeal being SA 135 of 2019 was admitted. During pendency of the appeal Shaheen Khan filed an application under Order 22 Rule 10, having acquired interest in the suit property by purchase.
- Accordingly, Shaheen Khan was substituted in place of Shakil Ahmed but in the cause title of judgment the name of Shakil Ahmed was typed inadvertently as respondent in place and stead of Saheen Khan.
- Another typographical mistake has crept in the second line of the first paragraph of the
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prakash Chand Vaidya & Ors.
- respondent
Shakil Ahmed
Coram
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/135/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court