The High Court at Calcutta criminal appellate jurisdiction (appellate side) dismissed an appeal in MAT 992 of 2018 as infructuous, as the appellant had ceased to press the appeal and counsel submitted the relief sought in the underlying writ petition was frustrative.
The appeal has been dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12 02.08.2023 D.Hira Court No. 12
In The High Court At Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side
MAT 992 of 2018
Syed Nurul Azhar Versus Mahammad Ishaque @ Md. Ishaque Khan & Ors.
Mr. Syed Shamsul Arefin, Ms. Nadira Abedin. … for the appellant
Mr. Syed Shamsul Arefin, learned counsel appears for the appellant and submits that relief sought for in the writ petition is become infructuous and he has not pressing the appeal.
In view of the said submission, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
(V.M. Velumani, J.)
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Syed Nurul Azhar
Mahammad Ishaque
V.M. Velumani
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
