Dismissed

Amrutanjan Healthcare Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC6 Feb 2023MAT/1974/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The intra-court appeal was dismissed, holding that the Writ Court correctly refused to interfere with the Industrial Tribunal's discretionary rejection of an application for an interpreter. The court ruled that intervention in forgone dismissals is generally inappropriate in old disputes.

What did the court decide?

The intra-court appeal and the connected application were dismissed with no order as to costs.

Amrutanjan Healthcare Ltd. Vs State of West Bengal… — Service and Employment | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

06.02.2023 M/L. 1

¶2

ns/pg Ct.16

¶3

MAT 1974 of 2022 With

¶4

I.A. No.CAN 1 of 2022

¶5

Amrutanjan Healthcare Limited Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

Mr. Anant Kr. Shaw

¶7

Mr. Mainak Ganguly………….for the appellant

¶8

Mr. Suvadip Bhattacharya Mr. Balaram Patra……………for the respondent no. 3

¶9

Mr. Susovan Sengupta Mr. Somrat Dhar……………..for the State

¶10

This intra-Court appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against the order dated 15^th November, 2022 in W.P.A. 11491 of 2022. The writ petition was filed challenging an interlocutory order passed by the 5^th Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata in Case No. VIII-25/2011 dated 28^th March, 2022 by which an application filed by the appellant for appointment of an Interpreter while examining one of the summons witness one Mr. V. Dhamodaran was rejected. Challenging the same, the appellant is before us by way of filing this appeal.

¶11

We have heard Mr. Anant Kr. Shaw, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Suvadip Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. The learned writ Court after considering the factual aspects and also taking note of the various questions posed to the

¶12

¶13

summons witness opined that the order passed by the learned tribunal was fully justified.

¶14

In our considered view, there is no error in the order passed in the writ petition. If the witness has any difficulty in understanding the questions posed to him during the course of cross-examination, it will be always well open to the industrial tribunal to issue appropriate directions, if in its opinion an Interpreter is required. In any event, the issue is one of exercise of discretion by the tribunal and it would not be appropriate for a writ Court or even an appellate Court to interdict a proceeding especially when the industrial dispute is of the year 2011.

¶15

Therefore, we find no error in the order passed

¶16

in the writ petition for us to interfere.

¶17

However, we make it clear that if in the opinion of the industrial tribunal an Interpreter is required at any stage of the matter, it will be open to the industrial tribunal to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶18

With the aforesaid observations, the appeal and the connected application are dismissed.

¶19

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶20

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities.

¶21

( T. S. Sivagnanam, J.)

¶22

¶23

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)

Amrutanjan Healthcare Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrutanjan Healthcare Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anima Prodhan Vs Chandi Charan Ghorai

Md. Khurshid Alam & Anr. Vs Md. Yousuf & Ors.

Dr. Amit Kr. Roy Vs Goutam Roy & Anr.

Monoranjan Das & Ors. Vs Pannalal Parekh

Smt. Mousumi Roy Chowdhury Vs Himangshu Sekhar Dhar (Smt. Kanan Sarkar Since Deceased)

Gopal Bhattacharya & Ors. Vs S S Isswar Kalimata Thakurani Reptby Ava Bhattacarya & Ors.