The single judge court dismissed the appeal as infructuous, noting the submission of the appellant's counsel. The interim applications were also disposed of, and any interim orders were vacated.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous; interim applications disposed of; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09.01.2023 S/L. No. 2 Court No.12 Suvayan/ Sourav
MAT 1828 of 2019 With IA No: CAN 1 of 2019 (Old No: CAN 11898 of 2019) With IA No: CAN 2 of 2019 (Old No: CAN 11899 of 2019)
Mofizul Islam Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy
…for the appellant.
Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy, learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous in the meantime.
Accordingly, the appeal being MAT 1828 of 2019 is dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid order the interim applications being CAN 1 of 2019 (Old No. CAN 11898 of 2019) and CAN 2 of 2019 (Old No. CAN 11899 of 2019) are also disposed of.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.)
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Mofizul Islam
State of West Bengal
Chitta Ranjan Dash
Partha Sarathi Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
