This short order condoned a 75-day delay in filing appeals under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution. It disposed of connecting petitions and set a hearing date for the main appeal.
Leave to prefer appeal allowed after condoning delay; connecting petitions disposed of; stay of job termination to continue till appeal disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.09.2023 SL No.180 Court No.8 (gc)
MAT/1663/2023 IA NO: CAN/1/2023 CAN/2/2023 CAN/3/2023
DEO KUMAR VERMA & ORS. VS PRIYANKA NASKAR & ORS.
Mr. Surajit Nath Mitra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Joydip Kar, Sr. Adv.,
Mr. Chittapriya Ghosh,
Mr. Asit Baran Ghosh,
Mr. Somesh Kumar Ghosh,
…for the Appellants/Applicants.
Mr. Kumar Jyoti Tiwari,
Mr. Tarunjyoti Tiwari,
… for the writ petitioner
Re: CAN 1 of 2023 With CAN 2 of 2023
2
the persons affected by the impugned order, the delay of 75 days in preferring the instant appeal is condoned.
Re: CAN 3 of 2023
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Deo Kumar Verma & Ors.
Priyanka Naskar & Ors.
Uday Kumar
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
