Dismissed

Sunandita Sarangi v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC3 Jul 2023MAT/1203/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the appeal against a tax demand order. The court held an appellate authority was available under section 9 of the Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1979, and filed the appeal there subject to depositing a sum and undertaking to file the order.

What did the court decide?

Appellant relegated to appellate authority subject to depositing Rs.50,000 and undertaking to file the impugned order copy.

Sunandita Sarangi Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Motor Accident Claims | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

03-07-2023 Item no.1 Subrata Bhattacharyya

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶3

Appellate Side

¶4

MAT No.1203 of 2023 Sunandita Sarangi

¶5

-vs-

¶6

The State of West Bengal & Ors. with CAN No.1 of 2023

¶7

Mr. Arabinda Chatterjee, sr. adv.

¶8

Mr. Bhaskar Nandi, adv. …for the appellant

¶9

Mr. Chandi Charan De, Addl. Govt. Pleader Mr. S.K. Halder, adv.

¶10

Mr. Anirban Sarkar, adv. …for the State

¶11

As the point involved is very short, dispensing with all formalities, we have heard out the appeal.

¶12

On principles, we find no infirmity in the impugned judgement and order dated 20^th June 2023 relegating the appellant-petitioner to the appellate authority under section 9 of the West Bengal Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1979 read with section 22 of the West Bengal Additional Tax and One-time Tax on Motor Vehicles Act, 1989.

¶13

The appellant-writ petitioner was aggrieved by a decision dated 23^rd May 2023 made by the Regional Transport Officer, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur making a demand of Rs.2,58,968/- as tax, additional tax, special tax together with fine for the period from 17^th January 2023 to 15^th May 2023 in relation to the appellant’s A.C. delux bus. According to the appellant, the amount should have been no more than Rs.23,766/- for this period, and even if 100% penalty was taken into account, it could not be more than Rs.47,532/-.

¶14

¶15

Mr Chatterjee, learned senior advocate representing the appellant, submits that the appellate forum is not available to his client as till date no appellate authority has been prescribed under section 22 of the West Bengal Additional Tax and One-time Tax on Motor Vehicles Act, 1989.

¶16

We are unable to concur with the submission of Mr Chatterjee. We have examined section 9 of the 1979 Act and section 22 of the 1989 Act. We have been shown the designation of the appellate authority under section 9 of the 1979 Act. There also must be an appellate authority under the 1989 Act which learned counsel have been unable to identify. At any rate, we are of the view that the appellate authority under section 9 of the 1979 Act would decide on appeal, the issue arising out of the said decision dated 23^rd May 2023.

¶17

We relegate the appellant to the said remedy. On the condition the appellant deposits Rs.50,000/- in an account specified by the Regional Transport Officer, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, by 14^th July 2023, then irrespective of filing of an appeal, the respondent authority will release the said vehicle to the appellant to be plied by her pending decision by the appellate forum. Plying of the vehicle and other matters relating to it, including payment of tax penalty, fine etc., would abide by the decision to be taken by the appellate body.

¶18

The appellate authority will accept the appeal on a copy of the impugned order dated 23^rd May 2023 subject to the undertaking of the appellant to file a certified copy thereof. If the certified copy of this order is not available, the respondent authority will act on the basis of a server copy thereof.

¶19

¶20

If no appeal is filed by 14^th July 2023, the said order dated 23^rd May 2023 of the Regional Transport Officer may be forthwith enforced.

¶21

The appeal and the connected application (CAN No.1 of 2023) are, thus, disposed of.

¶22

[I.P. Mukerji, J]

¶23

Biswaroop Chowdhury, J]

Sunandita Sarangi v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunandita Sarangi v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohindra Tubes Ltd. (Earlier Mohindra Tubes Pvt. Ltd. ) and Anr. Vs Haldibari Tea Manufactures LLP and Ors.

Darwabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons Ltd. Vs the Commissioner of Income-Tax, Ii, Kolkata

Partha Pramanic Vs Atanu Pramanic and Anr.

Associated Broad Casting Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs Abp Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Smt. Rukmani Devi Bangur & Ors. Vs M/S. Ray & Ray & Ors.

The State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs Suphal Chandra Pramanik & Ors.