Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-Ii), Kolkata v. M/S. Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION…
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O 66
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/678/2008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-II), KOLKATA -Versus-
M/S. BALARAMPUR CHINI MILLS LTD.
BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 7th February, 2023
Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. …for appellant.
Mr. A.K. Dey, Adv. …for respondent.
The Court : We have heard learned Counsel for the either side.
This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order dated 18th January, 2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘E’ Bench, Kolkata in ITA No.2022/Kol/2007 for the assessment year 2004-05.
The appeal was admitted on 15th September 2008. Thereafter, the appeal was heard along with ITA No. 176 of 2009 and both the appeals were disposed of by judgment dated 2nd July 2015.
Mr. A.K. Dey, learned Counsel for the respondent/assessee submitted that as against the said judgment the respondent/assessee has preferred appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and subsequently the assessee had availed benefit under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. In the light of the fact, the appeal
2
had already been disposed of by judgment dated 2nd July, 2015, no further order is required to be passed in this appeal.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
S.Pal/GH
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-II), Kolkata
M/s. Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd.
T.S. Sivagnanam
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court