The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous because it was inadvertently filed by the Department, noting a prior appeal with the same number already exists.
The appeal IPDPTA/79/2023 stands dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CD-5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE [COMMERCIAL DIVISION]
IPDPTA/79/2023
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. (OA/06/2020/PT/KOL) VS
THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS AND ANR.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 2nd February, 2023.
Appearance:
Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Adv. Mr. K. K. Pandey, Adv. Mrs. Mitul Dasgupta, Adv. Ms. Enakshi Saha, Adv.
The Court:- It is submitted that this application has been inadvertently filed by the Department.
This appeal has been registered wrongly as IPDPTA/79/2023. There is a prior appeal being IPDPTA/59/2023 already filed in the Department.
In view of the aforesaid, IPDPTA/79/2023 stands dismissed as infructuous.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
D.Ghosh
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
The Controller General of Patents and Designs
Ravi Krishan Kapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
