The applicant submitted that subsequent events made it unnecessary to proceed with the application. The Court dismissed the application as infructuous and vacated any interim order.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacationed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OC-82
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA (Commercial Division) ORIGINAL SIDE
IPDPTA/6/2023
SAINT GOBAIN ABRASIFS AND ANR (SR. NO. 56/2019/PT/KOL) VS DEPUTY CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 13th March, 2023
Appearance; Mr. Tanmoy Roy, Adv.
The Court :- It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that in view of the subsequent events they do not want to proceed any further with this application.
In view of the aforesaid, IPDPTA/6/2023 stands dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
S.Bag
Saint Gobain Abrasifs and Anr
Ravi Krishan Kapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court