The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appellant's appeal as withdrawn, vacating any interim orders.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OC-101
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE [Commercial Division]
IPDPTA/102/2023
ERYTECH PHARMA (SR/41/2018/PT/KOL) VS
ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 1st May, 2023
Appearance:
Mr. Nikunj Berlia, Adv. Mr. V. Kothari, Adv. Ms. Rajashree Roy, Adv. Ms. R. Bhattacharyya, Adv.
The Court:- It is submitted on behalf of the appellant upon instructions
that they are not interested in proceeding with this matter.
The respondent is represented.
In view of the aforesaid, IPDPTA/102/2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
D.Ghosh
ERYTECH PHARMA
ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court