The court dismissed F.M.A.T. 412 of 2014 for default due to uncorrected defects in the appeal highlighted by the Registrar Administration, finding the appellants were not interested in proceeding.
The appeal is dismissed for default. Any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.11.2023 Item No.11 Court No.6. S. De
F.M.A.T. 412 of 2014
Kartick Chandra De & Anr. Vs Mondira Ghosh.
This is an old appeal of 2014. We find from the records that there is a report of the Stamp Reporter dated April 22, 2014, pointing out a defect in the appeal which was required to be corrected by the appellants.
We also find an order made by the Registrar Administration (L&OM) on December 8, 2022, directing the appellants to remove the defect.
Nobody appears for the appellants. The defect has not been removed. Obviously, the appellants are not interested to proceed with this appeal.
F.M.A.T. 412 of 2014 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(M.V. Muralidaran, J.)
Kartick Chandra De & Anr.
Mondira Ghosh
Arijit Banerjee
M.V. Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
