The bench restored FMAT 330 of 2022 to its original number after finding sufficient cause for the appellant's default, and listed the matter for hearing.
The application for restoration of the default-dismissed appeal was allowed; the appeal was restored to its original filed number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
07.01.2025 sayandeep Sl. No. 36 Ct. No. 08
FMAT 330 of 2022 With CAN 3 of 2023 Bimal Kumar Biswas Vs. Chinmoyee Biswas
Mr. Amal Kr. Mukhopadhyay Ms. Tithi Mazumder
…. for the appellant
Mr. Arijit Bardhan Mr. Rishabh Dutta Gupta
…. for the respondent
In Re: CAN 3 of 2023
This is an application for restoration of the instant appeal which was dismissed for default on 30th August, 2023. After hearing the respective counsels and on perusal of the averments made in the instant application, we find that the appellant was prevented by a sufficient cause in not appearing on the said fateful day.
The application is thus allowed.
The appeal is restored to its original filed and number.
In Re: FMAT 330 of 2022
Let this matter be listed on 15th January, 2025 under the heading “ Order XLI Rule 11” .
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)
Bimal Kumar Biswas
Chinmoyee Biswas
Harish Tandon
Prasenjit Biswas
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
