Appeal against an interlocutory order in a withdrawn title suit dismissed as infructuous.
The appeal and application were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14 22.11.23
F.M.A.T. 242 of 2022
CAN 1 of 2022
Ct. No. 04
akd
Women’s Co-ordinating Council Vs.
Pulse Diagnostics Private Limited & Anr.
Ms. Ashika Daga, Ms. Ananya Sinha, Mr. Ayush Lakhotia. … for the appellant.
The present appeal arises from an interlocutory order passed in Title Suit No. 10 of 2022.
The attention of this Court is drawn by the learned Advocate for the appellant that subsequently the said suit has been withdrawn vide Order No. 17 dated 29th September, 2023.
In view of the fact that the suit is no longer in existence, the instant appeal and application have become infructuous and are accordingly dismissed.
Let the order no. 17 dated 29th September, 2023 be kept with the record.
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
2
Women's Co-ordinating Council
Pulse Diagnostics Private Limited & Anr.
Harish Tandon
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
