This order dismisses FMAT 1220 of 2014 (CAN 1 of 2014) for default, citing non-appearance of the appellant despite administrative notice.
Administrative notice served upon appellant, not represented nor any accommodation prayer accommodated. Appeal dismissed along with CAN 7152 of 2014. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10 01.03.2023
Ct-08
FMAT 1220 of 2014 with
I.A No. CAN 1 of 2014(Old CAN No. 7152 of 2014)
Shiva Brato Chakravorty
Vs.
Siddharth Chakravorty & Anr.
ar
The report filed by the department is taken on record.
In spite of administrative notice served upon the appellant, the appellant is not represented nor any accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellant.
Under such circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed for default along with CAN 7152 of 2014.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
There will be no order as to costs.
(Uday Kumar J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
2
Shiva Brato Chakravorty
Siddharth Chakravorty & Anr.
Uday Kumar J.
Soumen Sen, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
