FMA 918 of 1975 listed for dismissal without parties appearing. The High Court recorded non-prosecution and dismissed the appeal, vacating any interim order.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.02.2023 Court No.12 S/L. No. 5 Sourav/ Suvayan
FMA 918 of 1975
Bharat Industrial Works Vs. Union of India
None had appeared for the parties when the matter was listed on earlier occasion, nor any accommodation was sought for.
Today also none appears for the parties, nor any accommodation is sought for, though the matter has been listed under the heading “For Dismissal” giving sufficient notice and warning to learned Counsel for the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Interim application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.)
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Bharat Industrial Works
Union of India
Chitta Ranjan Dash
Partha Sarathi Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
