Parties failed to appear on the day of hearing despite prior notice and listing for dismissal. The appeal was dismissed for nonprosecution, with any interim orders vacated and applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27.02.2023 Court No.12 S/L. No. 1 Sourav
FMA 750 of 1978
With
CAN 1 of 2002 (Old No: CAN 2909 of 2002) With
CAN 2 of 2005 (Old No: CAN 2396 of 2005)
Baranagore Jute Mill Co. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.
State of West Bengal
None had appeared for the parties when the matter was listed on earlier occasion, nor any accommodation was sought for.
Today also none appears for the parties, nor any accommodation is sought for, though the matter has been listed under the heading “For Dismissal” giving sufficient notice and warning to learned Counsel for the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Interim application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.)
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Baranagore Jute Mill Co. Ltd. & Anr.
State of West Bengal
Chitta Ranjan Dash
Partha Sarathi Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
